DUI’s and Manslaughter Result from Parents acting as “Social Hosts”

Fifty-one cities and towns in Oklahoma have enacted so-called “social host” laws. Social host liability laws hold non-commercial individuals responsible for underage drinking events on property they own, lease, or otherwise control.

Such liability has long been the law in civil tort law in some states. Such laws in the law of torts (non contract responsibility) are called Dram Shop Acts. Under such laws, one who gives alcohol to another who is apparently already intoxicated is liable in money damages for the harm caused by the other who drank too much. That would include one who drank too much, then drove his car into an accident injuring or killing someone.

Many laws prohibit furnishing alcoholic beverages to underage persons. In contrast to these laws, social host liability laws (also known as teen party ordinances, loud or unruly gathering ordinances) target the location in which underage drinking takes place.

John and Cheryl Kyle of Tuttle, Oklahoma, are not charged with violation of a social host law. They are facing Second Degree Murder charges for serving at their home a teen who allegedly became intoxicated there and then drove his vehicle while under the influence of alcohol, caused an accident and killed a 15-year-old girl. They will appear in Grady County District Court on March 13, 2009, to face those charges.

The Kyles likely wish they were only charged under a social host violation. They are alleged to have given a party on January 11, 2009, in their home. The problem for the Kyles is that one of their guests allegedly did exactly what the social host laws are designed to discourage.

Reportedly, the Kyles admitted to buying $86 worth of alcohol for their party for their 15-year-old son and his friends. The next morning, one of their guests, 16-year-old Lance Davis, left the party. He wrecked his pickup on a rural Tuttle road and killed in the accident was 15-year-old Kaitlyn Mounce of Tuttle. Three other teens were injured, including Lance Davis, who is facing a First Degree Manslaughter charged for allegedly taking the life of Kaitlyn Mounce. First Degree Manslaughter is punishable by not less than four years imprisonment up to life imprisonment.

The City of Edmond was the first city to pass a social host ordinance in Oklahoma in January, 2007. In Edmond, police have made 71 social host arrests during the first year of its existence. The number of arrests has since dropped significantly.

The rationale of the social host laws is to regulate teenage drinking. A 2005 survey of teenagers aged 13 to 18 conducted by the American Medical Association (AMA) found that nearly half of teenagers surveyed reported having obtained alcohol; two out of three teenagers said it was easy to get alcohol from their homes without their parents knowing about it; one-third of teens reported it was easy to obtain alcohol from their own consenting parents; two out of five teenagers said it was easy to obtain alcohol from a friend’s parents; one in four teenagers responded they had attended a party where minors were drinking in front of parents; and for teens who obtained alcohol in the past six months, parents have been the supplier an average of three times in a six-month period.

In contrast to social host liability laws, teen party ordinances make it illegal to host a party where underage youth are drinking. Under this law, the offense is the hosting of the party itself and parents or older friends and siblings can be arrested if they allow a drinking party to occur with their knowledge. Teen party ordinances differ from social host laws in two ways:

• Adults do not need to serve or provide alcohol in order to break the law. It’s enough if alcohol is present at the party.

• It doesn’t require a young person to suffer injury or cause property damages in order to hold the adult host accountable.

Many communities have passed social host and teen party ordinances. For instance, cities in San Diego County, California have either passed or are in the process of passing social host liability laws. Many other cities in states around the country—like California and Connecticut— have also passed teen party ordinances as a way to curb social access to alcohol for young people.

Advertisements

6 Responses to DUI’s and Manslaughter Result from Parents acting as “Social Hosts”

  1. shari mounce says:

    Kaitlyn was my daughter and the parents should pay for her death.

  2. Perry says:

    Interesting that te parents bought the booze for their child plus the friends. The problem is not too hard. If you are going to do this take away everyones keys when the show up. Or better yet pick up all the friends at their own house and them bring over to their place for drinking. The real question is what type of parent buys $86 worth of booze for a 15 yr old

  3. Lawana Johns says:

    There is a reason the legal age to drink is 21. It is our job as parents to teach our children to obey the laws. The Kyle’s taught these kids to break the law and in doing so are ultimately the ones responsible for Kaitlyn’s death. I feel they should be punished accordingly. Second Degree is just not enough.

  4. Robin Braudway says:

    It is a very sad day when a parent buys alcohol for someone else’s child & as a result an innocent child had to die. Oklahoma should stand out from the crowd and send these people to prison for the rest of their lives to make believer’s of the next parent that want’s to be cool and buy someones underage child alcohol.

  5. Dana Bowman says:

    Funny how these same RESPONSIBLE parents (the Kyles) refused to let their own son, Tim, leave their home with the other teens they had given alcohol. They were quoted in the paper as stating they wanted to be the “cool parents” by giving the kids a safe place to drink. How in the WORLD is it safe to teach children to break the law and then let them drive away from your home KNOWING you supplied the alcohol to them. These ANIMALS need to be locked up for the rest of their lives. The time needs to fit the CRIME and the crime was MURDER.

  6. Teena Mowdy says:

    I AM MOST UPSET BY WHO GAVE THEM THE RIGHT TO SERVE THEM ALCOHOL? DID THEY CALL THE KIDS PARENTS AND ASK THEM? NO! WHEN OUR KIDS GO TO SOMEONE HOUSE WE ASK THEM IS THERE GOING TO BE ALCOHOL AND ARE THERE GOING TO BE PARENTS AT THE HOUSE? NOW WE HAVE TO CALL THE PARENTS AND ASK THEM ARE YOU GOING TO BE SERVING ALCOHOL OR DRUGS AT YOUR HOUSE. WE HAVE GOTTEN WHERE WE CAN’T FEEL SAFE ABOUT OUR KIDS GOING ANYWHRE. I JUST CAN’T GET OVER THAT THE PARENTS DID THIS SO THEY COULD BE COOL PARENTS. A CHILDS LIFE WAS LOST PARENTS SIBLINGS AND FAMILY AND FRIENDS LOST A SWEET SOUL THAT NIGHT JUST SO THEY CAN BE COOL. YOU HAVE NO RIGHT TO MAKE LIFE DECISSION ABOUT MY CHILD!!!!!!!!!!! I JUST HOPE YOU CAN SEE HOW COOL YOU CAN BE WHILE YOU ARE IN PRISON.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

w

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: